Attacks against wealthy people are still going on in spite of the fact the Welfare-State is plundering taxpayers. In a recently published book, sociologists – I should say ideologists – Michel and Monique Pionçon-Charlot are criticizing those they call “deliquents”. No, wealthy people are not offenders or delinquent. They are above all those who create jobs.
Nicolas Lecaussin
Nicolas Lecaussin
Directeur de l'IREF, Nicolas Lecaussin est diplômé de Sciences-po Paris, ancien président de l'IFRAP (Institut Français de Recherche sur les Administrations Publiques), fondateur de l'association Entrepreneur Junior et auteur de plusieurs ouvrages sur le capitalisme, l’Etat et les politiques publiques. Auteur et co-auteur de plusieurs ouvrages dont : Cet État qui tue la France (Plon, 2005), L’absolutisme efficace (Plon, 2008), Au secours, ils veulent la peau du capitalisme ! (First Editions, 2009), A quoi servent les riches, coauteur avec Jean-Philippe Delsol (Lattès, 2012), L’obsession antilibérale française (Éditions Libréchange, 2014), Anti-Piketty, coauteur avec Jean-Philippe Delsol (Éditions Libréchange, 2015), Echec de l'Etat, coauteur avec Jean-Philippe Delsol (Éditions du Rocher, 2017), Les donneurs de leçons (Éditions du Rocher, 2019).
According to a Eurobarometer / TNS Opinion, only 50% of the French people have a good opinion of their government whereas 46% have a bad opinion (4% are undecided). In Germany, the government gathers 73% favorable opinion and 23% unfavorable opinions (4% were undecided). Yet, in 2013 public spending in Germany reach 45.4% of GDP against 57.2% in France. A huge difference – 12 points – which does not contribute to the improvement of our public sector. That is a good reason to reduce spending.
The crisis of the world economy since 2008 has encouraged various governments to increase the share of public spending. This increase was a general phenomenon among the OECD countries and contributed to an unprecedented debt hike. An IREF study comparing the development of key economic indicators over the recent period (1997-2011) for some 30 OECD member countries makes it possible to update the link between public spending and economic growth in the light of the first impact of deficit spending between 2008 and 2009.
And in France, there is a high level of unemployment whereas it is low elsewhere. And elsewhere, there is no Labor Code, no unions, no judges, and everybody is satisfied with the freedom of work, as reported by IREF European contributors.
Reforming is a path for reelection: German Chancellor Angela Merkel privatized, deregulated, capitalized. She did not reflate nor accepted deficits : she reduced taxes. For sure, there are some lessons to learn for France.
This is the transaltion of an article published by Nicolas Lecaussin on August 14th, 2013
What is the common point between Socialists as Claude Bartolone, President of the French National Assembly, Pierre Moscovici, the Finance Minister, MP Jérôme Guedj, Conservatives as Xavier Bertrand, Health minister during the Sarkozy Presidency, Environmentalists as European MP Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Nationalists as Marine Le Pen, President of the National Front and her speaker Florian Philippot, and the leftist review “Marianne”? Well, there are all anti free trade! All of them have found the perfect solution to the devastating economic crisis: more Government intervention, less economic freedom.
Between 3 and 5 per cent of the members of Parliament, and 6 per cent of the senators: the parliamentarians with a background in business represent a tiny minority. An IREF study shows the contrast with four other countries where economic legislation is handled by people who know what it means. In France, the elected representatives are chiefly interested in tax money.
Les individus pauvres font confiance au marché. C’est la principale conclusion qui ressort d’une récente étude de la Banque mondiale bizarrement passée sous silence par les médias français. Analyse de Nicolas Lecaussin